Information & Resources

Find information and resources to help manage your pain.

Get Help & Support

Find the tools you need to
help you manage your pain.

Get Involved

Help make a real difference to people
in the UK living with chronic pain.

About Us

Find out about Pain Concern and how
we can help you.

chronic pain walking group

Walking and talking are known to help people living with chronic pain, and now a new group is stepping out to combine the two.

Steps is a free, regular walking group led by a trained walk leader around Glasgow Green, starting on Tuesday, 17 June.

Designed specifically for the needs of the pain community, the programme aims to encourage people living with pain to retain and increase activity levels through walking.

Walking is one of the gentlest forms of exercise and even a 10 minute stroll can have some health benefit.

Walkers will be given a pedometer during each walk and a personal log to track their progress over 12 weeks. All the walks will be on even, accessible terrain, and range from 10 to 30 minutes – the Steps programme is designed to provide a chance to try different lengths of walk according to ability and improvements over time.

All walkers will be invited to the café for refreshments afterwards.

The group meets at 2pm on Tuesdays at the People’s Palace and Winter Gardens main entrance at Glasgow Green. You can also RSPV via Meetup  

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Pain Concern’s Annual General Meeting is to be held on June 30th at 6:30 pm, with refreshments provided from 6pm, at our offices in Newcraighall.

Please find below links to download the relevant documents.

We look forward to seeing you there.

AGENDA of AGM 2014

OSCR_FINAL_COMBINED

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Stiff joints and dark thoughts: treatment of pain and the person

This edition has been funded by a grant from the Scottish Government.

‘Pain medicine isn’t good at dealing with the effect of pain on the person’, says Jonathan Bannister, Head of the Multidisciplinary Pain Team at Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. Paul Evans visits the clinic where Mr Bannister and some of his colleagues talk about how they care for people in pain.We hear about the difficulties of getting a referral and how pain specialists can help GPs add pain management to their armamentarium, or doctors’ toolkit. Physiotherapist Lynn Sheridan describes how she has to win the trust of patients scared of visits to the “physio-terrorist” after encounters with the vigorous methods of traditional physiotherapy. Her more gentle approach focuses on regaining function and helping people do more without flare-ups.

Helping people distinguish between their thoughts and the truth is one of the key aims of Clinical Psychologist, Dr Jonathan Todman. He explains why mental health is very often affected by chronic pain and how pain affects people with mental health problems.

Issues covered in this programme include: Physiotherapy, joint pain, depression, mental health, flare-up, multidisciplinary, waiting times, the biopsychosocial model, patient experience, activity-rest cycle, relaxation techniques, anxiety, and OCD: obsessive compulsive disorder.


Contributors:

  • Jonathan Bannister, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
  • Lynn Sheridan, Physiotherapist, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
  • Jonathan Todman, Clinical Psychologist, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Stiff joints and dark thoughts: treatment of pain and the person

To listen to this programme, please click here.

‘Pain medicine isn’t good at dealing with the effect of pain on the person’, says Jonathan Bannister, head of the multidisciplinary pain team at Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. Paul Evans visits the clinic where Mr Bannister and some of his colleagues talk about how they care for people in pain.

We hear about the difficulties of getting a referral and how pain specialists can help GPs add pain management to their armamentarium, or doctors’ toolkit. Physiotherapist Lynn Sheridan describes how she has to win the trust of patients scared of visits to the “physio-terrorist” after encounters with the vigorous methods of traditional physiotherapy. Her more gentle approach focuses on regaining function and helping people do more without flare-ups.

Helping people distinguish between their thoughts and the truth is one of the key aims of Clinical Psychologist, Dr Jonathan Todman. He explains why mental health is very often affected by chronic pain and how pain affects people with mental health problems.

Issues covered in this programme include: Physiotherapy, joint pain, depression, mental health, flare-up, multidisciplinary, waiting times, the biopsychosocial model, patient experience, activity-rest cycle, relaxation techniques, anxiety, and OCD: obsessive compulsive disorder.

Paul Evans: Welcome to another edition of Airing Pain, a programme brought to you by Pain Concern, a UK-based charity working to help support and inform people living with pain and healthcare professionals. This edition has been funded by a grant from the Scottish Government.

The Tayside pain service in Scotland is based on three main hospital sites, in Perth, Brechin and Dundee. It was at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee that I met Consultant in Pain Medicine and Anaesthesia Dr Jonathan Bannister, along with some members of his multidisciplinary team.

So who gets referred then?

Jonathan Bannister: We’ve moved, I think as probably most pain clinics have now, a long way from the old model where referral was very restricted, and we’ll take referrals from any medical professionals, or any paramedical professional, so we’re happy to take referrals from physiotherapists, psychologists, occupational therapists – anybody can refer into us who’s appropriately qualified.

Evans: But at what stage does a patient have to be before that happens?

Bannister: Too late usually, is the honest answer. Pain clinics have always been quite a scarce resource, and even now we hear patients who come and see us who say ‘I’ve been trying to get to the pain clinic to see you for years but my GP says: oh there’s no point referring you to the pain clinic because their waiting list is four years long, or two years long, or 18 months long’.

And of course we now conform to the same targets that everybody else does. So we have a 12-week referral to first appointment target, as everybody else does. And we meet that. So we conform to the same target as everybody else does.

The comment I made was that people get to see us too late. One of the problems with chronic pain is that it tends to creep up on people, and a lot of it can be managed outside a hospital service like ours; but a lot of it isn’t managed particularly well outside hospital services, because one of the things that one needs to do with patients who have chronic pain is to sit down, listen to them and explain what you believe is going on, so that they can understand what’s going on and transfer that understanding into a feeling perhaps of some reassurance that lets them get on with their lives. That’s very difficult to do in a seven or eight minute consultation with a GP.

So by the time somebody’s been filtered by their GP, or by their operating surgeon, or their physician. They can be maybe 12 or 15 months down the line before they get to us. In an ideal world you’d begin to treat chronic pain effectively using the whole biopsychosocial model structure from the minute the patient began to show that they were going to have pain for a prolonged period, and this wasn’t going to be fixable easily or quickly. The Scottish service model of chronic pain treatment will begin to address that, and there is a major redesign going on in Scotland just now to try and improve the way we, as a whole health service, help chronic pain patients, so that may move us to a better situation where chronic pain is treated earlier and more effectively, with a wider variety of approaches earlier in a patients journey.

Evans: How will that work then?

Bannister: The main thing that needs to change is what happens to a patient outside a pain clinic: so in their early phases, in their early parts of the journey with their general practitioner, with their physiotherapist, with pharmacists who might look after medication review, and this sort of thing. And also getting people access to things like self-management training, which is vitally important at a very early stage, so the patient learns to deal with their pain in the best way that they can so that the pain has less and less impact on the patient. Because what, certainly I find, is that pain comes with two problems: it comes with the problem of the pain, and the sensation of hurt and injury; and probably a bigger problem is the affect that that has on the person.

Now pain medicine, my particular sort of area of the speciality, the biological part of it, is not especially good at dealing with the effect of pain on the patient, and really that’s something they need to be trained differently to deal with. Pain management is anything but one size fits all. So we have a very catholic approach and we will do interventions and we do everything right up to and including spinal cord stimulation.

But it’s really important for everybody to remember that being a GP is incredibly difficult. It’s a really broad level of understanding and knowledge, and I qualified in 1980, and what I had to know to qualify then is really very small compared to what I would have to know as a GP now. They’re asked to do a vast number of things; one of the problems is that pain isn’t big on their list, for various political reasons.

So in a lot of ways you can’t expect a GP to be an expert in pain management, although it’s a very interesting conundrum because pain is the most common symptom that a patient will present with, so you’d think that the GP would be particularly interested in pain, but often pain is used simply as an indicator of what the other problem is and the interest lies in the other problem, not the pain.

Probably what we need to achieve with our colleagues in primary care is a better level of understanding of chronic pain and also we need to give our colleagues in primary care a much, much bigger toolkit to help people with. At the moment, for the majority of GPs, all they’ve got is a prescription pad. And we know that drugs are of limited value in chronic pain, there isn’t enough access to things like chronic pain physiotherapy, and by that I mean physiotherapy which is tailored to somebody with a pain problem, rather than tailored to somebody who’s just had a knee operation or a shoulder injury, which is very much rehabilitation to cure, which pain physiotherapy is not about: it’s rehabilitation to function.

Lynn Sheridan: My name’s Lynn Sheridan. I’m the specialist pain physiotherapist for NHS Tayside. Most of the patients that I see have had pain for a long period of time, falling into the chronic pain category. No matter where it is, that’s usually led to an element of deconditioning, so they’re less active because of their pain, which then leads to more pain. And a lot of my job is trying to educate and advise on how to get that function back again and increase their activity level.

Evans: Many people will think of a physio as a beast.

Sheridan: Yes. [laughter]

Evans: Or a beastess.

Sheridan: A “physio-terrorist” we’re often called. [laughing]

Evans: Is that justified?

Sheridan: Certainly not in the pain world, I would hope not. It’s a barrier I often have to break down because people have seen physiotherapists in the past who have inadvertently caused the pain to increase. As physios we are trained traditionally to deal with more acute pain problems and work on rehab from an injury that will improve over a period of time, so the treatment can be a little more vigorous and progress more quickly, whereas in a chronic pain condition the approach is a lot more gentle and paced and working on improving function, and hopefully not trying to flare the pain up too much. So, I would hope that I don’t fall into that category and that wouldn’t be justified, but it can take a long time for me to persuade the patients with regard to that as well.

Evans: So it’s a mind thing as well as a body thing?

Sheridan: Yes, absolutely, yup I think the mind comes in a lot in the chronic pain side of things. To try to break down the barrier of attitudes of healthcare professionals as well as the patients themselves.

Evans: One of the big issues with people with chronic pain is boom and bust I guess [Sheridan: yes]: it’s the pacing business [Sheridan: yep]. When somebody’s feeling well, they really want to go for it.

Sheridan: Yes.

Evans: And that’s the boom time, and the bust time comes later.

Sheridan: Absolutely, a lot of my work is trying to change that habit, if you like, and a lot of it is habit, that that’s what we’ve always done. We work through a job and we finish it, when you’ve got pain it’s not always that easy because it can lead to that bust cycle again.

Evans: But it’s more than habit isn’t it? Because it’s the, you know, feeling good when you’ve been feeling lousy [Sheridan: yep] is more than habit; you just want to grab it while it’s there.

Sheridan: I was speaking to a patient about this yesterday actually, and she said that she has a big fear around, if she doesn’t do all that when she feels good, when will she do it? And that fear of things are going to be bad again, so I’ll not have the chance to do that, but a lot of it is about changing that, because by doing everything all at one go, is perhaps then leading to that bust cycle, so it’s trying to change that.

Evans: So what did you tell her?

Sheridan: I asked her to keep an activity diary, to see if we can start to establish some patterns so that she can try and identify areas that we could possibly try to change. Doing it all in one go is not easy, and it’s not easy, pacing is difficult, I completely recognise that; it’s against what most of us would want to do because you have to plan a lot more carefully as well, I suppose. But, yeah, often getting the patients to keep an activity diary, so they can start to establish patterns of what may be contributing to a flare of their pain can help.

Evans: It’s actually writing something down, it’s like being on a diet, you write down the calories you’re taking and [Sheridan: absolutely] you suddenly realise that a bag of crisps is putting on five pounds. You don’t know what exercise you’re doing.

Sheridan: Yes, I think that’s it; a lot of people don’t recognise the role that stress and things plays as well, you know I’ll encourage them not just to write down activity levels, but how they’re feeling, what’s going on in their life at that point in time, because it’s usually a combination of a lot of things that cause a flare. And it’s not always a cause and effect straightaway, sometimes it can come on a few days later, so that it can be difficult to recognise, and in that way writing it down over a period of a couple of weeks [they] can start to see if there are some patterns there that you can change.

Evans: And can you spot patterns that perhaps the patients can’t?

Sheridan: Yes, I would say we can. [laughing] Probably more so, as we’re not in that lifestyle, I suppose, and looking at it from the outside you can sometimes identify little ways, or give suggestions on how things can be done differently, because we do get in a way of doing things and don’t often think of how to change that. So part of my job is helping with that problem solving on how to change tasks to make them easier, to pace them better, so they still get done, and people are perhaps doing more, but just in a different way than usual.

Evans: A discussion I often have at home is my lawn, I mow the lawn, complete, front and back. [Sheridan: yes] And I’m ill. [Sheridan: yes] My wife says ‘why did you do all that? The lawn will be here tomorrow, it’ll be here next week.’ And my argument is: ‘I may as well take the hit now’. [Sheridan: OK] What would you say to that?

Sheridan: I would agree with your wife, why do you need to do front and back in the same day? Perhaps doing one one day and one the next, you know I’m not saying to leave it for long periods of time – I know that can get frustrating as well – but it doesn’t all need to be done within that one day. And also looking at what else you’re doing on that day as well, if you’re going to choose to do that task in one day, perhaps just adapting what else you’re doing so that’s your priority for the day. And other things you might let go to another day, if it’s something you really, really have to do. Adding in some relaxation techniques and things to cope with that hit is maybe another way of managing that, looking at the things that help your pain and doing more of that on that day as well.

So, yeah we don’t always change everything, but just giving other ideas on how to help and to cope with that flare. And sometimes it is a choice, you know, people have events to go to, weddings and things, and they know that that’s going to cause them a hit, and I wouldn’t say don’t go. It’s just planning a little better for that.

Evans: When somebody is referred to you, and they haven’t done any exercise for goodness knows how long, are they frightened, or worried that they’ve been referred to a physiotherapist?

Sheridan: Yes. Absolutely, and they often look terrified to be there, and it takes a lot of persuasion to encourage them to continue with the physiotherapy treatment. And usually at that point in time I will try and concentrate the consultation on finding something to send them away with that they can do, rather than giving them an exercise sheet of things that they struggle with, to try and reduce that fear to some extent.

Evans: Do people go away thinking, ‘well all she’s done today is got me to bend my wrist, or something like that?’

Sheridan: Yeah, quite frequently people do say, ‘is that all that you want me to do?’ And I think that’s usually a perception of what they’ve had in the past from physio, which they have said hasn’t worked, so we need to try something different and what I’m asking them to do is to add something new into their day that they can manage, and putting them in control of that as well.

So it might be that it is only bending their wrist, but they may spend most of their day avoiding doing that because it’s sore, so if they can bend it five times in a day, more than what they were doing, then we can start to build up that strength there, so it’s starting at a level that’s comfortable.

Evans: What’s your perfect outcome?

Sheridan: Improved function is my perfect outcome for a patient. I would never promise to any of my pain patients that I’m going to reduce their pain because that’s usually unrealistic.

Sometimes we can, whether that’s through an improvement in function, therefore the pain becomes less of an issue to them, or whether some of the exercises do help to reduce some muscle tension that’s causing extra pain on top of what they have, but, yeah, any improvement in function, range of movement, these kind of things is a positive.

And for some people just not making them worse – so they’re managing their condition in a way that prevents their muscles from weakening and their joints from stiffening, which may cause their pain to get worse in the future. If we can prevent that then that’s a positive outcome as well.

Bannister: If it was easy for a GP to get somebody into psychology or self-management, or appropriate psychotherapy, or an OT they would probably do that a lot more than reach for a prescription pad. But, at the moment, if the only thing you’ve got is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and that hammer is a prescription pad.

Evans: Somebody I was talking with said that they’d been all through years, and years, and years with a GP, and the final solution was a conversation with the community psychiatric nurse, who I’m told was absolutely fantastic, [Bannister: yes] and sent this person on an expert patient course. Wouldn’t it have been lovely if that had happened much earlier?

Bannister: Yes. Doctors are trained to improve patients’ lives, and that’s why we’re all doing it. Sometimes that means you say to the patient, ‘I’m really sorry, I can’t do anything more here, I need to get you to see somebody else.’

Sometimes it can be difficult to let a patient go and to admit that you can’t do what you thought you might be able to do, and so some of the issues around when patients get referred are to do with how a doctor views their contract, if you will, or their responsibility to the patient, to hang on to them until they’ve done absolutely everything they can possibly think of, within their remit, or whether to go, ‘hmm, this is not going how we want, let me get you to somebody else who may have a bigger armamentarium’. And that’s not going to change. You’re talking about changing human nature there.

But I think if you offer GPs a large armamentarium of appropriate therapeutic options for chronic pain, then they will inevitably begin to use them. It won’t happen overnight, but as they learn that if you send somebody to a self-management training programme, if you send them to the right sort of physio, if you send them to an OT who understands chronic pain, they’re not continuously back in your surgery saying, ‘this still really hurts doctor, can I have some more drugs?’

Jonathan Todman: I’m Doctor Jonathan Todman, I’m a clinical health psychologist in NHS Tayside.

Evans: And you work as part of the pain management team in Ninewells Hospital in Dundee?

Todman: I work as part of the clinical health psychology department and we take referrals from anywhere, but a large number of our referrals come from the pain services in Tayside.

Evans: So who refers to you?

Todman: At the moment referrals come from GPs, we get a lot of referrals from the pain clinic, whether that’s from the anaesthetists or the physiotherapists, pain nurses, I sometimes get referrals from other psychologists, where issues have moved into health issues from mental health issues. So in principle anyone from the health service can refer to us.

Evans: So you work specifically in the chronic pain field?

Todman: I suppose the work that we do is, anyone with a physical health problem that is affecting their mental health, I suppose, would be one way of defining it. But chronic pain fits very squarely within that.

Evans: Explain how chronic pain fits into that?

Todman: Living with chronic pain, the amount of things that that means to the patients in terms of what they’ve had to lose as a result, what they have to cope with on a regular basis, those affect their mental health. So as a result of trying to deal with those aspects they often develop things like depression, or anxiety, or I suppose, alternatively, there are people with existing mental health problems, who then get a physical health problem like chronic pain and it complicates matters further, makes it harder to manage that mental health problem.

Evans: If somebody said I had a mental health problem, I feel I would get a mental health problem from being told I had a mental health problem.

Todman: Yeah, I kind of agree, so psychologists sort of deal with this in different ways and my approach is that it’s a perfectly understandable response; it’s a reaction to an abnormal situation, having to live with that amount of suffering on a daily basis, it would be strange to think that someone would have no effects on how they feel about the world or themselves. So it’s not that they have a diagnosis in addition to the mental health problems, I’m not a psychiatrist, there’s no particular reason for me to give anyone a diagnosis, and I don’t talk in those terms with patients. But there are similarities as well, so it’s useful for me to be able to think it terms of depression or anxiety, those are often responses to stresses – whatever’s going on in your life – it’s the response to those stresses that tends to be similar. Whether it’s pain or whether it’s grief or some other factor from childhood or whatever it is, it’s the response to that that ends up being quite familiar patterns of behaviour and of thoughts.

Evans: Can you explain that?

Todman: The thoughts that people have are the things that will determine what they feel like they’re able to do, they’ll determine what they feel they’ve lost and where it is they’re hoping to go. So, I mean in some senses thoughts are important because they have all that power to affect what we’re able to do.

And a lot of what we end up working on in psychology is trying to address those thoughts. I suppose one thing that we’re trying to do though, is also to try and recognise that those are just thoughts. There will be reasons why that thought comes up, but partly because of the power that thought has it’s given an awful lot of credence; it’s given its own power because it feels so terrifying sometimes, or the feelings attached to it may make those thoughts more powerful. So sometimes what we might do is, we might try and work with patients on recognising that a thought doesn’t need to be the same thing as a truth.

Evans: A thought is a thought and not an action.

Todman: Yeah, it’s not an action, it’s not the truth, it’s not a reality, it’s just a thought and we have a hundred thousand of those in a day. And it’s worth remembering that this one we had that had all those responses in our body, made us feel awful and all that sort of thing, well that was just another one of those thoughts. It’s just one that happened to have all these responses attached to it.

It’s a part of these symptoms of depression and anxiety to give particular thoughts particular weight, so thoughts that something awful is going to happen feel more believable when you’re feeling anxious than when you’re not, perhaps [thoughts] that you’re worthless, or you failed are given more believability when you’re feeling sad or depressed.

Helping patients understand that that’s a part of what’s going on, that these thoughts have been given power to effect what we’re able to do sometimes helps them reduce that power, whether just by doing the thing anyway, recognising that they are thoughts, or by giving them ways of taking the thoughts on a little bit, checking them out and seeing whether they stand up to scrutiny. I’m describing sort of two different therapeutic approaches there, and I might do one or other with different patients, but that’s a part of the process.

Evans: You mentioned earlier that you see people with chronic pain who have become depressed, if you like, but you also mentioned that you see people with mental health problems who develop chronic pain through that?

Todman: I wouldn’t say people develop chronic pain as a result of having mental health problems, but I suppose there’s an overlap in these two groups, there are people out there who’ve for a long time suffered with depression and anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder or post traumatic stress disorder, all sorts of things that we have diagnoses for, who may have seen other psychologists or psychiatrists in the past. And when they get this new thing happening in their life, they need to find a way of integrating it, of understanding it on top of everything else that’s going on. They may have been coping quite well with their life up until the point that they had this physical health problem, but they now have this new problem on top of it, that they have to adjust to.

A lot of what we do is really about that process of adjusting to something, and whether or not someone’s had mental health problems in the past, or has them now, this is something that they need to integrate into themselves – find a way of remaining themselves despite having pain.

Evans: So it’s people who develop chronic pain and it’s just another weight on their shoulders?

Todman: I guess that’s a way of thinking of it. I mean the way I often see people with physical health problems in general is that we have to give them similar coping strategies that we have to give people with depression and anxiety, or OCD or whatever. But we need to give them even more of it; they need to be amazing copers in order to cope with all the things that are going on. And it’s always a source of amazement to me that people are able to cope so well – I see examples every week of people who have to cope with an unbelievable amount to pain, as well as everything else that’s going in their life that the rest of us struggle with, and yet manage to find some meaning in their lives to feel like they’re moving forward.

How you tell that is different with different people and their different ways of looking at it – there’s a whole psychological therapy now, acceptance and commitment therapy, that has as one of its strands an attempt to move towards the valued areas of your life. And when you see people start to do that in their own way, then the days have meaning to them, they’re not able to do everything they once were, they’ve come to terms with that, accepted their limitations but aren’t willing to say that they’re not going to move towards the things that matter to them, they’re not going to give their life to the pain, they’re going to say, ‘how do I still move forward in spite of this pain?’

Evans: I’ve been looking at the posters in the waiting room of your clinic here in Ninewells Hospital in Dundee, and there are a lot of posters, are they self-help or self-management?

Bannister: They’re self-management: the important thing to do is to learn what you can do by yourself, or within yourself with your own resources, to manage your pain better. I have a bit of an issue with the word self-help because there are self-help books by the thousand out there, and as one of my colleagues in another discipline once said, ‘self-help books tend to help one person, and that’s the author.’ That’s a very, very, very broad brush and I’m not, and I’m obviously not tarring everybody with that same one, I don’t know, it’s just that self-help just seems a bit frilly and a little bit…

Evans: It also implies that the patient, the person buying the book is doing something wrong.

Bannister: Exactly, and they’re not. In the case of self-management for pain, it’s not that you’re doing something wrong, it’s the case that you could do something better, and different. And different and better is a really important approach in pain management and pain self-management in particular.

We work very closely with a group called Pain Association Scotland, and we both contribute to a six-week intensive course where patients go for half a day over six weeks. And also we discuss the progress of the services with Pain Association, and also they have monthly groups that patients go to for top up and support. The number of times that patients’ lives are completely turned around by these self-management approaches is remarkable. Equally remarkable is what appears to be a response from a lot of patients who go in thinking, ‘this is nonsense, this is all fluffy, how can this possibly help’, and then by about week three the light bulb goes on and they go, ‘this makes so much sense. I had never realised how much sense this makes, and I’d never realised how much I can do this’.

So we have people who, with Pain Association’s help, are going back to work. Not everybody, but the vast majority of people experience an improvement in their quality of life as a result of these programmes.

Evans: I can vouch for that. How do you get that message across to people who don’t know that?

Bannister: It’s difficult. It’s part of the process of acceptance of change. We’ve all come across these circles where you see people who are ready to roll, they’re ready to change, there’s a contemplative phase where they’re thinking of making that change, people who are pre-contemplative, they’re just not quite there yet and people who are just not interested.

I think one of our jobs as ‘experts’ in pain medicine and in treating and managing pain, is helping people around that circle to the point where they can accept that this makes sense. And of course one of the things that is really important for a patient to realise is that doing self-management is part of the whole approach of what we do in pain clinic – it’s not a separate or a hand off, or an annex to us. It makes enormous sense integrated into the way we work. And so if a patient is learning self-management at the same time as we’re optimising their medications or perhaps doing some interventions, it makes the whole system work much more powerfully, much more synergistically.

Evans: That’s Dr Jonathan Bannister, who leads the NHS Tayside pain team, at Ninewells Hospital Dundee.

Don’t forget that you can still download all editions of Airing Pain from painconcern.org.uk, or you can obtain CD copies direct from Pain Concern. If you’d like to put a question to our panel of experts or just make a comment about these programmes then please do so via our blog, message board, email, Facebook, twitter, all the contact information is on our website, where you will also find details of Airing Pain’s companion magazine Pain Matters, which is available as an online subscription or direct by post.

As I say in every programme, that whilst Pain Concern believes the information and opinions on Airing Pain are accurate and sound, based on the best judgement available, you should always consult your health professional on any matter relating to your health and wellbeing. He or she is the only person who knows you and your circumstances and therefore the appropriate action to take on your behalf.

I’ll leave the last words to Lynn Sheridan, Jonathan Todman and Jonathan Bannister.

Bannister: Those patients who take control of their direction of travel do much better than patients who are very passive.

Todman: It’s a lovely feeling to feel like you’re progressing and you’ve found something that gets you out of bed in the morning, and gets you going to bed at night thinking that was worth doing, what’s next tomorrow. That’s the stage I want to get the patients to.

Sheridan: If a patient comes in and says that they have gained some help from what I’ve given them, or a patient that has done exactly as I’ve asked and has noticed the benefit of that, it certainly makes me smile very, very brightly.


Contributors:

  • Jonathan Bannister, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
  • Lynn Sheridan, Physiotherapist, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
  • Jonathan Todman, Clinical Psychologist, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Pain Concern has set up a forum for young adult carers across the UK.

pccc

Based in the Lothian region, the Pain Concern Carer Community is a forum for young adult carers to discuss, share information, and keep up with news in the pain community.

With close links to our magazine and radio show, the Carer Community will be a great resource for young adult carers to get support and get in touch with Pain Concern, our expert panel, and each other. Questions you ask will be taken to our expert panel and answered later on our website.

Join the forum here.

The forum is part of a Young Adult Carers project, which aims to feature the young adult carer perspective, provide information and bring together this community. A magazine article looking at anger in relation to young adult carers features in the current issue of Pain Matters. Two Airing Pain programmes, in which we speak to young carers, families and professionals, will be broadcast in June and July. Later in the year, look out for our dedicated information leaflet.

Funded by the City of Edinburgh Council.
edinburghcouncil

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Artist’s impressions of pain in the clinic, and – clubbing or model railways? – why living a good life with pain is in the eye of the beholder

To listen to this programme, please click here.

If only pain were visible… Deborah Padfield talks to Presenter Paul Evans about her project collaborating with people with pain to produce works of art that represent their experiences. Her photographs are co-creations, using objects and ideas brought to the studio by the orofacial pain patients from University College Hospitals, London.

The art produced not only provides a voice for individuals who may have felt their experiences marginalised by the medical establishment and wider society, but is also part of a study aimed at finding better ways for people to communicate their pain. Images created by Padfield – from a clenched fist to flying sparks – are now being trialled by patients not part of the project as visual prompts in ordinary medical consultations.

‘Pain is a memory’, says Dr Rajesh Munglani, explaining how the way we feel pain is affected by past experiences and our emotions. From the phantom limb pain of a soldier wounded in action to an injured motorist caught up in a bitter legal struggle for compensation, the context of chronic pain can be crucial in helping or hindering people from moving on. The different ways people perceive their pain also means, Dr Munglani argues, that perhaps pacing is not right for everyone, all of the time – a big night out might mean a few days in bed for a teenager with pain, but provide an important boost to their confidence.

Issues covered in this programme include: Arts and crafts, orofacial pain, communicating pain, pain perception, neuropathic pain, trigeminal neuralgia, visualisation, memory, amputation and phantom limb pain.

Paul Evans: Hello, and welcome to another edition of Airing Pain, a programme brought to you by Pain Concern, a UK-based charity working to help, support and inform people living with pain, and healthcare professionals. This edition’s been funded by a grant from the Scottish Government.

Pain is invisible and it’s subjective, so trying to express or quantify it can be difficult. Have you underplayed it? Have you overplayed it? And do people believe you? Yes, there are well-established numerical scales by which medical professionals can chart your progress, but could there be a better way for you, the patient, to convey exactly how you feel? If only pain were visible. Well, pain may not be, but the arts, so they say, can convey emotions much better than words. Music can have a valuable therapeutic role, but what about the visual arts?

Deborah Padfield is a visual artist working mostly with photography. She’s collaborated in a project with facial pain specialist Professor Joanna Zakrzewska and her team at University College of London Hospitals.

Deborah Padfield: The project has a lot of different strands, but the first strand is co-creating images with – in the present project – with facial pain patients. And I’ve been really lucky. I’ve got a wonderful group of patients I’ve been working with, who are phenomenally creative and bring all sorts of ideas and objects to those sessions, and I work individually with them to make the photographs. So I’m taking the photographs, but using their metaphors, some of their ideas – we discuss the ideas together, so they really are co-creations and they bring in all sorts of objects.

And the reason I want them to be co-creations is I think by the time someone’s got to a pain clinic, they’ve been investigated so many times, they’ve been on the receiving end of the medical gaze so frequently – I think it’s quite important to reverse that, and that people need to be in control of how their pain is seen, how it’s understood by others. It’s not appropriate or inappropriate; it’s not adaptive or mal-adaptive; it’s what they’re experiencing. And to put it in a shareable space, so it’s not trapped within the body and hidden and private, but it’s out in a collective, shareable, visible place.

We’ve taken a selection of the images and we’ve made them into the pain cards that you see here. At the moment, it’s a collection of 54 cards and we’re still evolving which images we select, so we’re in a study, we’re recording which images get selected most often by patients. And these cards are actually being used not by the patients who have contributed by co-creating them; they’re used by patients who’ve never seen them or been part of the project. They’re coming to normal consultations.

We’re doing a study with, I think it’s 10 different clinicians in different specialties within pain medicine at UCLH, and in the facial pain team and pain management teams – and we’ve done a study group not using images and recording it. We’ve got use of a wonderful… it’s an artificial hospital at UCLH, so the cameras are terribly discreet and hidden. And we’re recording a baseline group not using them and now we’re recording a study group where patients are given the images about 20 minutes before the consultation and then they’re asked if any of the images mean anything to them or resonate for them in some way, or even if they can say that’s not like my pain – my pain is hotter or my pain is like this; it’s not like that – if in some way they mean something to them.

They take those images in, and what we’re seeing is can that change the type of conversation that clinician and patient have? Can it allow other aspects to enter the dialogue? There are so many aspects that I think get missed out if you’re measuring it from 1 to 10 – it’s not broad enough as a sentiment. And when you think the pain is intensified by so many aspects of our lives, if those aspects are not brought into the consulting room and discussed, and the impact pain has on people’s lives, you’re limiting the exchange that can take place. So it’s not trying to say it’ll be alright if the patient talks forever and tells their story forever, but it’s trying to equalise that space, so that the exchange that happens between patient and clinician is useful and is shared. And my observation, which follows my hopes for it, really, was that when you have an image between two people, you have to negotiate.

We all interpret images differently, for instance, we had a session yesterday when we were talking about some of the images and there was an image with a lot of hands around a figure, and some people interpreted that as someone being very supplicant and asking for help from all these hands around. Someone else interpreted it as being actually some figure of authority or some clinical figure and there are all these hands trying to get help – so a complete reversal. But it means that what that image triggers in you is what’s relevant. It doesn’t matter how anyone else sees it. If it can reveal something useful, that you need to bring to that consultation and open up that dialogue. And it doesn’t have to stay connected to the image. It’s just a trigger.

Evans: Let me just try some of these images on myself. [Padfield: Uh-hum] Let me just look through some of them, describe them, and see what they say to me, and perhaps they say something completely different to you. Well, they will say something…

Padfield: They probably will.

Evans: They will say something completely different to you. I’m going through these cards. There’s one here of a fist, a black and white image, a fist clenched, thumb under the forefinger. Now that says to me tension and a gripping pain – almost cramp.

Padfield: That is probably actually pretty close to the experience of the person who I made that with. I think there was a certain amount of anger, but there was the gripping and the sense of tension within it. Some of the images are more literal, and some are more ambiguous, in the hope that you can project more of your own experience onto them. Joanna Zakrzewska is trialing them in her own routine clinics now, which has been really fascinating.

Sometimes she uses the images of the sparks, which are more literally a neuropathic pain or more likely to be a TN pain, but I know that she’s also been discovering that what has been interesting is not always the cards patients select, but also the ones they don’t select, or when they say ‘it’s not like that, it’s not sparks’. And it’s been particularly helpful with people where English isn’t their first language.

Evans: I’ve just picked up this one [with the] sparks. It’s three electrical wires and a firework coming out of it and I’ve just been talking to a lady with TN – trigeminal neuralgia – and that’s exactly what she was talking about. If I’d gone to my GP and said, look, that’s how I feel, I would like to think that my GP would say, ‘I know what he’s feeling’, or ‘there’s something to start a conversation here’.

Padfield: I think there are two things that… The starting a conversation, that’s what I hope is important – it’s not an endpoint; it’s the start and it’s having permission to say it’s like that and see wherever that conversation goes. But I think also, the other thing is you’re saying you‘ll say it to your GP. If, hopefully, you said that ‘my pain is like that’ to your GP, hopefully they’ll recognise it’s TN. You would then be referred correctly and speedily, because I think what happens with a lot of people with facial pain and particularly trigeminal neuralgia – they wait an incredibly long time before they actually get the right referral to a facial pain clinic which deals with trigeminal neuralgia.

Evans: I know that images are used by psychologists to express emotion and things like that – and I’m thinking of a very famous image, Munch’s Scream, which is so evocative of pain: sharp pain and anguish, and people might recognise that – but these are slightly different. Some of them come straight out, but there’s an image here of an empty hospital bed with some words: ‘invisible’, ‘confusion’, ‘not asked’ and ‘why’. Let me ignore the words – it says to me immediately not panic, but worry.

Padfield: Yeah, there’s an anxiety.

Evans: I don’t know what’s going on.

Padfield: I think there’s confusion, anxiety and some of the letters of the words are spelt back to front. I think I was making that with one of the patients from Bradford, and one of them was describing the sense of confusion around and hearing the voices and things talking about you on the bed and around it and it actually not making sense. I don’t think I totally understood that at the time and now I do because I actually have occasions where I will look at letters on the Underground and, I know the words, I can see them, there’s no problem with sight, I can’t make the letters mean anything.

But again, this one you’ve picked out, which isn’t necessarily the most successful image in the aesthetic sense, in the gallery context, but in the clinic context, Joanna Zakrzewska was using this in one of the consultations – I think it might even have been one of our recorded ones – and the person who’d chosen several of the images actually held onto this until fairly late in the consultation. And then Joanna asked her why she’d chosen this particular image and she said she was actually worried about the anaesthetic and that’s why she was terrified of surgery, so that then elicited a whole conversation about the reason she hadn’t wanted to have surgery, which then managed to be turned around.

So I think if you can elicit things which maybe are difficult to say, the hope is that an image can give you permission to say it. And that maybe the image can give a feeling of rapport between clinician and patient, or the clinician can have a way of accessing and understanding it and hopefully that both speakers can shift their position a little. I think communication is successful when there’s movement and there’s a chance for both speakers to shift their understanding, and if that works in medicine, that’s great, you can work together and both go forward to hopefully a successful treatment and management. I think when you’ve got an impasse, as so often you have, it’s very difficult to effect that sense of movement and trust.

Evans: Now there’s another image here of cogs and gears and spanners. My first impression when I first picked it up was – ‘I have fibromyalgia – this describes what my brain does when I’m going through what I call an attack of fizzing and not being able to turn down, constantly bouncing from one side of my head to the other’. I’ve taken a second look at it – [pause] no, I’ve still got that same image. Now, I may not be able to describe that to a doctor, but talking about the image makes it so much easier for me to describe what’s going on in my head.

Padfield: What were you going to say when you stopped, you looked, and you said, when I looked at it again, and then you said ‘no’?

Evans: When I looked at it again, I saw a spanner and I thought, ‘this is a broken body; this is a broken me. It’s not my brain at all because I interpreted the cogs and gears as the working of a watch, whirring around all the time’. Now, I’ve seen the spanner, and I imagine it as the workings of a car and the car being broken. So that’s two separate images, but just by you asking me what did I not see, or what was I about to see, has brought the second image up.

Padfield: I think it’s really interesting. You’ve picked up on lots of things that are within that image: it actually is a broken – literally, it’s a broken clock – and I made it with someone who was very, very keen and knowledgeable about clocks. And he’d had a period where he died and was resuscitated. And when he was resuscitated, he started working with clocks, and clocks suddenly became terribly important – he started taking them apart and putting them back together again. So I think maybe there’s a sense of this being, as you say, the body or the mind actually falling apart, and maybe there’s a spanner in the works somewhere, if you take a very literal metaphor, but also maybe there’s the hope that there’s all this spiralling everywhere, maybe those cogs can be put back together.

And maybe the question is, who does that? Who puts this body, this mind, back together? Is it us as patients? Do we expect it all from a clinician, or can somehow we recognise that together, and actually both effect that movement forward? Because I don’t think you can do one without the other; maybe we have to do more of it as patients.

Evans: Well, I was sceptical. Firstly, I work in radio, doing anything on art on the radio can be a [Padfield laughs] little bit of a nightmare, however, I’m incredibly impressed that I could carry one of your works of art, a photograph, a creation, around with me and hold it up to somebody when I’ve been trying to explain what my condition feels like, where I can hold a photograph up and say, that’s how my brain works. That’s how my arm feels. This is the pain I have in my head. It’s so much easier than words.

Padfield: And how does that make you feel? If you can actually say, this is what it feels like, what change does that effect?

Evans: Well, it would make me feel a lot better about myself, less guilty about not looking ill. It would save an awful lot of explanation. What I and many people say when they say, ‘gosh you’re looking well’. I say ‘Yeah, I’m fine’. Whereas, actually what you want to say is ‘I feel total rubbish. This is how I feel: here’s a picture of it.’

Padfield: Yeah. It’s changing the expectation from the other person as well, isn’t it?

Evans: That was Deborah Padfield.

Now, the feelings or emotion conjured up from seeing or hearing a work of art depend on so many stimuli, past and present, all retained in memory. So does memory have a similar role when it comes to the way we experience pain? Dr Rajesh Munglani is a consultant in pain medicine and lead clinician in pain services at the West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds. Previously, as a lecturer in the University of Cambridge, he ran a research lab looking at the mechanisms of pain.

Munglani: I actually got into my research looking at memory formation and my initial question about that many years ago was ‘can you remember under anaesthesia? If you’re having an operation, can you form memories?’ And what we showed is that in fact, you can, in certain situations, form memories, despite the fact that you’re not aware of what is going on. That is called ‘implicit memory formation’.

Now, the interesting thing is, as soon as I started doing the research, I realised that pain is a memory. And it’s the same sort of thing that if you, for example, have a really nice meal at a hotel, and you [take in] the smell of the restaurant, you find that, to re-experience that rather nice event, say, a few months later, all you need is one smell, the smell of the food and that will re-evoke the whole atmosphere.

In the same way, chronic pain is a memory. It’s a circuit that’s been set up and it doesn’t take much to keep it going. You don’t have to have the initial trauma – say, it was an accident or an operation – you can have just very light touches that set the whole thing off or a certain movement, or a certain unpleasant experience that you experienced emotionally, and it will set off the whole pain experience.

If you say, ‘does that mean it’s not real?’ The answer is no, it’s actually very real, because everything in our brain is related to memory. That’s our identity. I don’t know if you remember seeing Bladerunner and the guy realises that the robots all have memories and they don’t know they’re robots, because the memories have been implanted and then he has to think about his own. He’s sitting there playing the piano and looking at all the photographs and it is really quite an important concept that what we’re dealing with and what we try and disrupt, if we need to, is that circuit, and there are lots of different ways of disrupting that circuit.

Evans: So I could go to a concert and I could experience the wonderful violinist on the stage and there could be somebody coughing next to me or somebody smelly next to me and I could go home and listen to the CD of that, and I’d have a completely different experience. Or, perhaps whenever I listen to that music again, I would have the smelly, noisy experience [Munglani: yes], not the full emotional…

Munglani: Absolutely. It’s been modified, and you can modify it. And that’s actually a very interesting way… you may have listened to that symphony in the past and you may have a really nice attachment to it, but then subsequently it’s modified. One of the ways of an unpleasant memory being tackled is through the psychological approaches and what you attach to that memory subsequently and lots of different techniques are called for. And some psychologists will be able to talk about this in a better way than I, but, for example, reframing: you put different contexts around different meaning to that memory. It’s very clever. It works for some people and it doesn’t work at all for others. [For] other people, you have to just modify with drugs, trying to get rid of the circuit and other people of course…

What I do is spend my time finding the triggers, like we talked about the smell that evokes the restaurant. There are sometimes, in the body, little triggers that set off the central pain state and they’re called ‘peripheral triggers’ or ‘peripheral maintenance of central sensitisation’. Something from the periphery feeds in, keeping the whole thing going, and so what we can do as well as working on the central memory and modifying it through, say, psychology, through drugs, you can do something about the peripheral trigger. You can, for example, kill it off, numb it, as I do sometimes, Botox it, take away the muscle spasm, and we know that that is not the whole pain, but that’s all you need is to take down the evoking of that memory.

Evans: Lots of people give the example – and you may have given it as well – that if I stamp on your toe and tell you, ‘oh, by the way, somebody’s stolen all your money and your bank has gone bust’, you will feel quite a lot of pain, but if I stamp on your toe and I say, ‘oh, you won the lottery too’, the pain might not be so severe. So the pain isn’t finite – it’s the surrounding, it’s everything else that feeds into it.

Munglani: Absolutely. The context of pain, the context of suffering, is very important. If you have a memory of a pain and it’s associated with, for example, deeds of valour, and you came out of it well… I mean, when I treat military guys – this is interesting –the way they stand up to certain pains because of the context of the pain meant there was meaning to what they did, meaning to the outcome. Doesn’t always work, but this is… It’s not meant to sound condemnatory to anybody else, but if you have had that experience [of getting] your leg blown off; I’ve seen people who, for example, stepped on mines, had an amputation and still have severe phantom limb pain, but they’re now riding horses, running event companies. They have got back to normal life.

You see others who have lost their leg in a road traffic accident – deep anger at the drunk driver involved, who caused this to happen. And the focus for them very much becomes the court case, the anger at the driver being allowed to go off with a relatively little fine, which often happens and they’ve got the pain in the leg still. So you have this awful situation of trying to help them move on from that experience and, of course, that is where reframing that whole experience – trying to get them to come to terms with the pain, is part of the healing process in letting them move on, and people do move on.

But sometimes you get stuck. You can get stuck physically because the pain is just too severe to deal with. One of the issues is if the pain is that severe, your brain cannot move on because the trigger, say, the stump is painful – every time the stump hurts, it triggers the whole phantom limb experience; it triggers the memory of the accident and you can’t get them to move on and they can’t do it for themselves. So this is where lots of interventions [are necessary]: do you numb the end, do you kill off some nerves, do you put a pump in their back? As well as helping them move on with, say, the court case, the medical-legal process. All of that needs to end to help them move on with their lives, otherwise, they’re trapped. They’re in a prison.

Evans: The examples you’ve given give fairly clear reasons why the pain has started in the first place, but I know you’ve written a paper on diagnosis and the effects of diagnosis on people with chronic pain.

Munglani: The issue about diagnosis has to be seen in two or three different ways. And the first way to say is that a lot of people wander around in pain and they have no idea what’s causing it and most doctors don’t understand what’s causing it. To give those people the dignity of a diagnosis, I think, is terribly important because it validates the pain and the suffering they’re going through and that’s important.

But pain isn’t the same thing as disability. What we know for some people is that when you give them a diagnosis, they look it up on the internet and they think, ‘oh my goodness! This is how I’m going to end up’. And the worry and the fear actually promotes disability.

So there is a distinction between a diagnosis and a disability. The two aren’t the same at all. In fact, if you look in scientific terms at what is known as a correlation coefficient, i.e. how likely is it with a certain diagnosis, you’ll have a certain level of disability, there is virtually no correlation. And that is quite important because what it says is believing people, giving validation to their pain experience by giving them a diagnosis, the dignity of a diagnosis is important. But you can use that moment then to help them move on and reduce the disability.

The unfortunate option is that people can get stuck looking on the Internet and looking at what horrendous things may happen, and they become fearful. And I think Job said in the Bible: ‘that which I greatly feared has come upon me’. And it is amazing how we are sometimes trapped by our fears. But it also gives us a way forward; that’s important.

There’s no judgment here, and I emphasise that again – there is no judgment. If you look at all pain mechanisms, we are dealing with such a complex issue. An important thing to understand is you can move on from these situations, if there’s a willingness there to move on. Sometimes it’s incredibly difficult and this is why pain therapies sometimes take a long time; you have to go through various trials to find what is the right approach because there’s such different ways of maintaining that pain and the disability that comes along with it.

So, for example, the medical-legal situation is one I’m very aware of because I do so much medical-legal work, is that people get trapped because fundamentally, the money you will get at the end of a court case has to be based on how much disability you’ve demonstrated – not just simply on the diagnosis. [For] the diagnosis there are certain amounts of money you will get for, say, chronic lower back pain or injury or even spinal trauma, but what actually makes the difference and where the big money is, literally, is in whether you can work in the future and what your care costs are – that is where the big money is. So, what is related to not working and how much care you need? Disability.

So the disabling effect of a medical-legal process is profound. And we know for some people, the only way to get them to move on is to end that process as soon as it is humanly possible. For me, then we’ve seen cases where once the court case ends, the people can move on. In fact, one or two people improved so much once the case had ended that the insurers in one case went back and asked for their money back because this guy got out of the wheelchair. It was a big, big case. And the interesting thing is, the court refused because what they said was no, we decided this is how disabled he’s going to be and we said that there was always a possibility he might improve with treatment, and there we are, but he’s improved, so there we are, but the money that we’ve set aside is there for him.

And it was almost a relief to some people because what it meant was that if you had finished a court case and you then got a bit better, would you always be fearful that the compensation you got was going to be taken away from you? Because if it was, think how disabling that would be: it would mean you’d be trapped into a cycle of appearing disabled or being disabled for the rest of your life, so that people would still believe that you were injured in an accident. And so it was quite an important case.

Evans: It’s incredibly important because anybody who’s been through this – through tribunals or whatever – will tell you how stressful it is going through it. It’s box-ticking: you feel you’re box-ticking. ‘Can I walk? Oh no, I can’t walk. But what if I walk tomorrow?’ ‘Don’t even go there. Don’t even get out of your wheelchair.’ And it is enormously stressful.

Munglani: Absolutely. The assessments that a lot of people are going through at the moment through the disability assessment forms from the government – because there, as you know, there is a very strong political drive to get people off disability benefits and back to some sort of work. And in one sense, I applaud that.

The issue is, with pain, I cannot feel your pain; you can’t feel mine. And the actual presentation of disability is dependent on so many factors and, as you say, it’s not whether you can walk, but how far you can walk. So I would say there are two things: there’s capacity – whether you are able to do something at all – and endurance – how long you can do it for – and that, unfortunately, is not really taken into account.

The fact that you can probably pick up a heavy weight two or three times in a day is fine, but you couldn’t do it thirty times seems to be lost on a lot [of people], or certainly they choose to ignore that fact, that most people can do something, but they may not be able to do it for very long. You can do a bit of gardening but you can’t garden all day long and end up with backache.

This is one of the big issues we have in [the] medical-legal process: how much you can do and for how long you can do it. Simply being able to walk doesn’t mean you’re going to be able to work again.

Evans: And for many people – ‘yes, I can do it all today and I may be able to do it tomorrow, but I can’t tell you about Wednesday. And if I do it today, I can tell you categorically that I will be in bed next week.’

Munglani: Yes, yes. And as you know, this leads… Jumping to the solution of what’s known as ‘pacing’. And rather than having the up-down, yes, you do a dramatic amount when you’re feeling a lot better, and then you collapse in bed for two or three days. And then this undulation between the stop/start and you try and regularise that…

I’m not sure, actually – I’m probably going against the grain a bit here – I almost feel it’s very good for the person to have that day of absolutely doing… I mean, I have patients, for example, who are young and in chronic pain and they go clubbing on a weekend, but it does mean that for the next three or four days, they can do virtually nothing. But on the day they went clubbing, they felt alive, they felt normal. And it was terribly important for them to do so. They don’t want to live in the mediocrity of pacing, they went to go to the dizzy heights of dancing for an hour or so and then they know that for the next few days, they’re not going to be able to do anything.

But the interesting thing is, say they were on disability benefits and somebody caught them in a club dancing – and that has happened – there’s cases where, for example, people have been claiming disability benefits and they’ve been caught dancing at a wedding.

Now, does that mean they weren’t disabled? And the answer is, I don’t think so. It’s not as simple as that. Sure, there are cases where there is fraud, but actually, many times, it’s because it’s their daughter getting married or their son getting married and they want to celebrate at that point, knowing there is going to be a cost for them to do that, say, for the next few days, they’ll be in bed. But I think it was important for them to dance at their son or their daughter’s wedding, so whatever for that individual gives them a quality of life, that’s important. But you have to have an understanding society around you and I think that is being lost at the moment.

Evans: Dr Rajesh Munglani.

Don’t forget that you can still download all editions of Airing Pain from painconcern.org.uk or you can obtain CD copies direct from Pain Concern. If you’d like to put a question to our panel of experts or just make a comment about these programmes, then please do so via our blog, message board, email, Facebook, Twitter. All the contact details are at our website, where you’ll also find details of Airing Pain’s companion magazine Pain Matters, which is available as an online subscription or direct by post.

As I say in every programme that whilst Pain Concern believes the information and opinions on Airing Pain are accurate and sound, based on the best judgement available, you should always consult your health professional on any matter relating to your health and wellbeing. He or she is the only person who knows you and your circumstances and therefore the appropriate action to take on your behalf.

I’ll leave the last words on the changing relationship between patient and doctor to Dr Rajesh Munglani:

Munglani: The patient has to be part of the solution and this is where, in pain particularly, the previous paradigms of what is a doctor-patient relationship… As a consultant, I know when I first started, what I said basically went. We would say, ‘this is the solution for your problem’ and you’d do this. In chronic pain, you can’t do that; you have to be far more flexible. This is why I very much support, for example, the Expert Patient Programme – enablement; empowering patients to help be part of the solution. And it’s not in a sort of fuzzy-wuzzy, sort of well, let’s all just hug and hold each other’s hands – it’s actually a very fundamental difference of how we manage a condition which we know, unfortunately for many, has no cure.

So we have to find a way forward that gives you a quality of life. And sure we can modify the pain by injections, drugs, psychotherapy, etcetera, but in the end, the final common outcome that we all want is a quality of life for that person. So we have to say, what gives you pleasure in life? And what gives you pleasure may be completely different… If looking at model railways is what turns you on, great, but if it’s going clubbing, then fine and you’re going to have very different solutions for that process. So [it’s about] deciding what is good for you.


Contributors:

  • Dr Deborah Padfield, Artist and Researcher, Slade School of Art, University College London
  • Dr Rajesh Munglani, Consultant in Pain Medicine, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Artist’s impressions of pain in the clinic, and clubbing or model railways? Why living a good life with pain is in the eye of the beholder

This edition has been funded by a grant from the Scottish Government.

If only pain were visible…Deborah Padfield talks to producer Paul Evans about her project collaborating with people with pain to produce works of art that represent their experiences. Her photographs are co-creations, using objects and ideas brought to the studio by the orofacial pain patients from University College Hospitals, London.

The art produced not only provides a voice for individuals who may have felt their experiences marginalised by the medical establishment and wider society, but is also part of a study aimed at finding better ways for people to communicate their pain. Images created by Padfield – from a clenched fist to flying sparks – are now being trialled by patients not part of the project as visual prompts in ordinary medical consultations.

‘Pain is a memory’, says Dr Rajesh Munglani, explaining how the way we feel pain is affected by past experiences and our emotions. From the phantom limb pain of a soldier wounded in action to an injured motorist caught up in a bitter legal struggle for compensation, the context of chronic pain can be crucial in helping or hindering people from moving on. The different ways people perceive their pain also means, Dr Munglani argues, that perhaps pacing is not right for everyone, all of the time – a big night out might mean a few days in bed for a teenager with pain, but provide an important boost to their confidence.

Issues covered in this programme include: Arts and crafts, orofacial pain, communicating pain, pain perception, neuropathic pain, trigeminal neuralgia, visualisation, memory, amputation and phantom limb pain.


Contributors:

  • Dr Deborah Padfield, Artist and Researcher, Slade School of Art, University College London
  • Dr Rajesh Munglani, Consultant in Pain Medicine, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Prescriptions for yoga and harnessing the power of social interaction

This edition has been supported by a grant from the Scottish Government.

In Airing Pain episode 55 we hear about two very different ways of giving people in pain the knowledge and power to help themselves.

Will we soon be able to get a prescription of yoga on the NHS? Christine Johnson speaks to yoga teacher Anna Semlyen about a study that shows yoga can be an effective and cost-effective treatment for chronic low back pain. Semlyen, who helped design the programme used by the research trial, recalls how she has seen people get back into gardening or extreme sports after taking up yoga. The research study found a similar effect among the group of patients using yoga: reduced levels of disability and fewer days off work compared to the control group. Not only is this a low-tech and cheap treatment, but it’s also empowering, argues Semlyen, as it lets people ‘be their own healers’.

‘How are you?’ Three little words often dreaded by people in pain. Gareth Parsons explains to Paul Evans why these simple social rituals can be so difficult for people in pain and how social interactions can instead be made empowering. Parsons’ work on participatory action research gets people in pain together to recognise the negative attitudes or oppression experienced in daily life and find ways to help themselves. The real experts on pain are not the clinicians of researchers, but the people who live with it every day, he argues.

Issues covered in this programme include: Alternative therapy, yoga, social contact, arthritis, back pain, medical research, raising awareness, peer support, exercise, stretching, physiotherapy, the biopsychosocial model, pain as a condition in its own right, relaxation therapy, mindfulness, activity-rest cycle, discrimination, oppression, stigma and relationships.


Contributors:

  • Anna Semlyen, yoga teacher, British Wheel of Yoga
  • Gareth Parsons, Lecturer, University of South Wales.

More information:

  • You can find out more about using yoga to help with lower back pain and buy the yoga programme book and accompanying CD from the project’s website: Yogaforbacks.co.uk.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Prescriptions for yoga and harnessing the power of social interaction

To listen to this programme, please click here.

In episode 55 we hear about two very different ways of giving people in pain the knowledge and power to help themselves.

Will we soon be able to get a prescription of yoga on the NHS? Christine Johnson speaks to yoga teacher Anna Semlyen about a study that shows yoga can be an effective and cost-effective treatment for chronic low back pain. Semlyen, who helped design the programme used by the research trial, recalls how she has seen people get back into gardening or extreme sports after taking up yoga. The research study found a similar effect among the group of patients using yoga: reduced levels of disability and fewer days off work compared to the control group. Not only is this a low-tech and cheap treatment, but it’s also empowering, argues Semlyen, as it lets people ‘be their own healers’.

‘How are you?’ are three little words often dreaded by people in pain. Gareth Parsons explains to Paul Evans why these simple social rituals can be so difficult for people in pain and how social interactions can instead be made empowering. Parsons’ work on participatory action research gets people in pain together to recognise the negative attitudes or oppression experienced in daily life and find ways to help themselves. The real experts on pain are not the clinicians of researchers, but the people who live with it every day, he argues.

Issues covered in this programme include: Alternative therapy, yoga, social contact, arthritis, back pain, medical research, raising awareness, peer support, exercise, stretching, physiotherapy, the biopsychosocial model, pain as a condition in its own right, relaxation therapy, mindfulness, activity-rest cycle, discrimination, oppression, stigma and relationships.

Paul Evans: Hello and welcome to Airing Pain, a programme brought to you by Pain Concern, a UK-based charity working to help, support and inform people living with pain and healthcare professionals. This edition’s been funded by a grant from the Scottish Government. Today, I’ll be looking at two research studies on the management of chronic pain, the outcomes of which, if accepted and adopted by the NHS [National Health Service], would not only improve the quality of our lives, but save money.

Anna Semlyen has been involved in teaching backcare yoga for around 18 years. She was involved in a randomised control trial by the University of York with funding by Arthritis Research UK into the effectiveness of yoga as a treatment for chronic and recurring low-back pain. Over 300 adults were recruited from 39 GP practices across England. They were randomly divided into two groups: one assigned to the Yoga for Healthy Lower Backs 12-week course developed for this trial; the other, to a non-yoga group.

Pain Concern’s Christine Johnson went to meet her.

Anna Semlyen: We were trying to encourage people to do, in some ways, the minimum amount of exercise that would be needed to maintain back health. So we used 22 other research trials and synthesised them into what the minimum amount of exercise is, and variations on those exercises, that would give you all-round flexibility, strength, comfort and ability to function well within your body. It was designed for people who had no awareness – absolutely beginner therapeutic on-the-floor-type yoga. So you need a reasonably warm venue. You need people to feel quite safe. The yoga programme was designed for all kinds of lower back problems – whether you had a slipped disc, whether you had sacral pain caused by an imbalance in the sacroiliac joints or one side of the pelvis further forward and twisted compared to the other, the programme can deal with it and [help people] find comfort and ease of movement.

We found that originally, people in our trial referred from their GP had about eight different problems on a scale called the ‘Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire’: problems like not being able to put on their socks without pain from their back or sleeping less well because of their back. Three months into the trial, the yoga group had two and a bit less problems than the group who had gone just to GP care. What we’ve proven is that… statistically valid results for yoga within 3 months carry on for a whole year of benefits after starting classes.

We also found that people were very safe practising yoga – there were not any serious adverse events in the yoga group. We found that it was cost-effective. Its main effect was to reduce the number of days off work by eight over the year between the two groups, with the yoga group doing significantly better.

We also had yoga teachers from two different traditions teaching: we had British Wheel of Yoga teachers – I’m the British Wheel of Yoga’s specialist advisor on backcare and therapeutic research – and we also had Iyengar Yoga teachers, so we helped bring two yoga organisations together and proved that teachers from different traditions could both teach a standardised programme. This was not in any way a sort of yoga-teacher-do-what-you-like programme; there were written, class plans that each teacher was made to follow, and somebody came in to quality-check that they were doing the exercises in the right order, to the right amount of time and with the right props.

So, it works, it’s safe, it’s cost-effective and it’s [been] proven with a proper, randomised controlled trial on a large study. So it was like having a prescription of yoga.

Christine Johnson: From your own experiences, could you tell me about some of the benefits you’ve seen in people you’ve taught or how their daily lives have changed because of doing yoga?

Semlyen: Do you know – this work is just fantastic for job satisfaction because people tell me that their lives are transformed? A lady who, for instance, had a large garden and wanted to retire to her gardening, found that she couldn’t garden anymore and this had completely blown her vision of what her later years would be like. She needed help with this large garden and was thinking of having to move because she couldn’t cope with it. She did my course [and] she’s a happy gardener. It’s made her feel independent again.

There are people who are in their 20s [with] back pain, and they are seriously worried that they won’t be able to keep their jobs or find a partner because of their back pain. So it’s transforming the other end of the spectrum in terms of ages. And it very much helps people to feel well. Of all the issues in our lives, yoga teachers recognise that health is very, very important, and when you have good health, everything else is easier – whether it’s working or playing with your children or doing the sports that you love to do. I’ve had people go back to canoeing, for instance, that they enjoy but weren’t able to safely do because if they had a back spasm, what could they do? I’ve had people go back to rock-climbing and quite adventurous activities because they’ve done the course and feel better.

I’m sure it’s saving marriages; I’m sure it’s saving people’s jobs. If back pain is actually keeping you away from jobs that you would otherwise be doing, then learning a simple set of exercises is a massive transformation in people’s quality of life.

Johnson: Now that this research has been published and people can really see the results, what knock-on effect do you think it could have or do you hope it could have?

Semlyen: First of all, we hope that a lot of yoga teachers will train, maybe 500 in the next year or two. Secondly, that the NHS will buy yoga, now that yoga has an evidence-base. It’s medically proven to work for people suffering [from] chronic and recurrent lower back pain, which is a huge burden on society, so the NHS should buy yoga – that’s what the research says. Thirdly, that yoga will become something that is more normal as an activity for anybody who has restricted mobility because of their back. They will feel confident [about] doing yoga, particularly with a trained yoga teacher – because this is specialist yoga. There are types of yoga that are too vigorous for people with backache. In searching out a yoga teacher, you want somebody who does specialise in back pain, to be sure that you’re safe with them. So, yoga is something that GPs ought to be buying their patients and I hope that yoga will become free on the NHS.

Certainly as the NHS changes away from the primary care trust towards clinical commissioning groups at GP-level, I can imagine yoga being a very important part of the future of the NHS. For instance, you want people to come to local clinics, rather than main hospitals and a yoga class could be taught at a GP practice, I think, or a local hall. We used non-NHS premises in our trial – we used community centres and schools and the like, and found that it’s very low-tech. A minimum amount of props would be a yoga mat, the book, the CD, possibly something to put underneath your head like a book or a yoga block. We encourage people to use a blanket, we encourage them to use a chair, sometimes we use belts, but they weren’t anything special – they could just be dressing gown belts. So you’ll have most of the equipment at home already. Compare it to an MRI scan or something like that to find out exactly what kind of functional problem there is – but, actually, we’re offering functional solutions.

Evans: That’s Anna Semlyen talking to Pain Concern’s Christine Johnson. For further information on that research, the book and CD developed for the trial, and how to find a qualified teacher, go to the Yoga for Backs website. That’s yogaforbacks, no gaps, yogaforbacks.co.uk.

As I say in every programme, that whilst Pain Concern believes the information and opinions on Airing Pain are accurate and sound, based on the best judgements available, you should always consult your health professional on any matter relating to your health and well-being. He or she is the only person who knows you and your circumstances, and therefore the appropriate action to take on your behalf.

Now, chronic pain is described as a bio-psycho-social phenomenon, meaning it affects and indeed is affected by biological, psychological and social influences. Its treatment using the biomedical model is now well-established, but is the social domain of pain given the same emphasis? Participatory-action research is the approach to research in communities that aims to empower participants through seeking transformation of exposure to similar others, reflection on self and consciousness-raising. Sorry, but that’s gobbledygook to my small mind, so what’s it mean? Gareth Parsons, who’s a clinical nurse specialist in pain management, now a Senior Lecturer at the University of South Wales, is passing on his experience to student nurses… and me.

Gareth Parsons: Unlike conventional research where a participant would normally be viewed as maybe a passive subject who’s trying out a drug treatment or, in a qualitative piece of research, as somebody who’s being interviewed, just as you’re doing to me now – participatory-action research involves groups of people discussing their lives and coming to some kind of new form of knowledge based around that discussion.

Evans: So that’s the theory. Gareth’s been using the method in his own PhD research to find out whether the lives of patients of chronic pain would benefit from collaborating with each other in their own learning communities. The participants for three such learning communities were recruited from a pain clinic and a general practice in South Wales. Now, over the last few years of making these Airing Pain programmes, if there’s one thing I’ve learnt, it’s that there are plenty of experts in pain management for us to turn to. So what could we lay members of the pain community – the patients – add to the wealth of knowledge that’s already out there, Gareth?

Parsons: I’ve worked in a clinical practice in pain for seven years before I came here, I teach students about pain management, I’ve written a book on the subject… so in a way, you might say that I’m an expert in pain, but my knowledge of pain is theoretical. If we think about chronic pain as being an entity in its own right, then the only people who really have expertise in it are those who have chronic pain. Everything else is theoretical: we don’t really know what it’s like. We might know how to help people or we might have some ideas of how to help people, but we can’t help people if we don’t acknowledge the fact that they are the experts.

Evans: What’d you mean by acknowledging pain as something in its own right? I have a condition, it’s called ‘fibromyalgia’.

Parsons: When somebody has a condition, of whatever sort, one of the symptoms of that condition might be pain. And if you view pain as just a symptom, then you’re going to try and treat that symptom without looking at the whole person. I believe that when somebody has pain, it affects them at a personal level: it affects who they are and [I believe] that people in pain are different to how they are when they aren’t in pain. That means that people with different conditions who have pain have something in common with each other. To say to somebody ‘you’ve got fibromyalgia’ or ‘you’ve got osteoarthritis’ or ‘you’ve got a bad back’ or ‘you’ve got trigeminal neuralgia’ is to categorise them into their condition and is to ignore the impacts that condition, and the problems that arise from that condition, impose upon them in their lives. So somebody with chronic pain is restricted in what they can do in their lives: it affects them in lots of different ways.

Not everybody’s affected in the same way, but there are similarities. And as an expert in pain, I’ve been taught a lot about how to manage the symptom of pain. A lot of that comes from treating acute pains, which largely involves physical treatments on a biological entity. More recently, we’re coming to think about pain as something that has psychological dimensions. There are treatments out there now which explore cognitive aspects of pain, behavioural aspects of pain… and they’ve been shown to be very effective. But an area of pain which is overlooked is the social aspect of pain. When people are learning together, they’re leaning in a social context and that social aspect, I think, has been overlooked in research.

Evans: What do you mean by social aspect – which social aspect?

Parsons: If we go back to where I got the idea for my research from, first of all. When I started off as a clinical nurse specialist, I was working in a district general hospital. I was an acute pain nurse and a chronic pain nurse. We were developing a chronic pain clinic and we were looking at interventions that I could do as a nurse in the chronic pain clinic. So it wasn’t just about giving people drugs and giving them injections, we were trying to explore other things as well. And one of the things that we were interested in exploring was this idea of mindfulness – I guess you could think about it as relaxation therapies, but a bit more than that as well: body consciousness, being aware of what your body’s doing. So we put on classes for people – we called them ‘relaxation classes’, but they were really more about the idea of mindfulness.

What I found was that the patients who were taking part weren’t really listening to us when we were instructing them on how to do relaxation techniques – they were too busy chatting to each other. We thought, first of all, that this was a bit of a – you know, what’s going on here? We thought it’d evaluate very badly because people weren’t really picking up their relaxation lessons, they weren’t really putting them into practice. But they kept coming back and they kept coming back and they wanted more and more. Initially, we just did a 6-week programme – people come for a couple of hours once every 6 weeks, [but] they wanted more and more.

There was something about the social interaction that was going on. The social interaction wasn’t intended – what was intended was that I would be the expert teaching people how to relax, because I’d done a course on relaxation therapies and mindfulness. So I was going to share that expertise with them. They circumvented that; they broke the rules and interacted with each other. That made me think there’s something going on here, there’s social interaction. It evaluated very well. This was a time of GP fund-holders and GP fund-holders were telling us that their patients liked it and they’d like to do some more because they were willing to pay for it. So that started off a germ of an idea: it’s not what we were offering them that was helping them, it was the interaction with each other, because we were doing it within a group.

So that started off my idea that there’s something about people sharing stories within a group. In my role as becoming an educator, one of the educationalist theories that I came across was [by] somebody called Paulo Freire. He wrote quite a famous book called The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. He was working in Brazil at a time when, if you couldn’t read and write, if you weren’t literate, you couldn’t vote. So he was training people who couldn’t read and write to read and write. And in doing so, they were getting the vote, they were becoming empowered. So he linked the idea of educating people to the idea of liberation from some kind of oppression.

So that was one area that I was interested in: people becoming conscious of their social condition and thinking about how sharing those experiences amongst each other enabled them to develop what Freire called ‘consciousness-raising’. As you explore your life, you develop awareness – you become conscious of how your life is limited. That’s the first action in becoming empowered.

Evans: I’ve heard similar expressions with the term ‘disability’. [Parsons: mm-hmm] What does ‘disabled’ mean – is it a person’s physical condition that is disabling them, or is it society’s attitude and reaction to that person that is the disabling factor; who is disabling who? And that’s the same as oppression, I guess.

Parsons: Yes. When I started off, my idea was having chronic pain imposed physical limits on somebody – not just physical limits, because it’s a bio-psycho-social problem, I recognise that, so it also imposed limits in terms of their thoughts and their behaviours and their ability to interact with other people. I thought it was being pain that was the oppressor, [but] through doing my research and working with my co-participants, I’ve come to realise that that’s only part of the story and the other part of the story is, as you say, the way people respond, the way people behave towards people who have pain, contributes towards their pain.

So, the social interactions that they have with others, creates a situation which contributes to their oppression. But people aren’t aware of this and the people who are oppressed – the people in pain – also buy into this through their lack of consciousness and they are also involved in oppressing themselves and also oppressing other people with chronic pain who aren’t like them.

Evans: So who is the oppressor: the pain, the person with the pain or the person without the pain?

Parsons: This is the interesting thing, because a lot of these interventions that were designed to help people in pain or with any chronic illness, if you take diabetes, for example, they are all about encouraging self-management. If you look at the writing on self-management, it talks about it being empowering. So the idea is that nurses who work with people with diabetes are involved in empowering people with diabetes. Or people who go to cognitive-behavioural therapy for their chronic pain are being empowered by the therapy.

Now that’s nonsense – because you can’t empower somebody else. The only person who can empower somebody is yourself – only you can empower yourself. Now what you can do is create a set of conditions which allow people to become emancipated – similar, I guess, to slavery. If you look at what happened in America, when slavery was abolished, black people were still oppressed. Getting rid of slavery didn’t stop people being oppressed. In a way, you could say that pain is like slavery, in that it’s a condition which people might say that’s oppressed them, but the reality is, it’s the attitude towards people who are in pain and also the attitude that people in pain hold about themselves and their abilities, which is the oppressor.

Evans: Going back to what you said about you being the expert talking to the group of patients [Parsons: yes] and them basically ignoring you [Parsons: yes] and finding each other [Parsons: yes], I’ve been in that situation [Parsons: mm-hmm] through the Expert-Patient Programme [Parsons: yes]. I found when I did that, that actually there was nothing much new that I hadn’t read in the books because I’d done a lot of reading; I knew all the theory as well, but the real benefit was being in that group and being allowed to smile with other people in pain, where pain actually doesn’t become the focal point of the meeting.

Parsons: Now that’s interesting, because that’s similar to what I found in my study. If you think about it, the reason why people are being brought together by me is because they’re in pain. But when we actually got together, although we talked about pain and we shared stories about that, we also talked about a lot of other things as well, including, what the weather was like and what was on the telly and what books I’d read, what their hobbies and interests were. Because these topics weren’t about pain, I wasn’t initially interested in those, but I came to realise quite quickly that was important – this sharing, this being able to open up to each other and tell people things. They were sharing things with people who were relative strangers that they couldn’t share with their family or their friends or their GP, because it would sound ridiculous. They’ve never felt able to share those things because they thought they won’t be believed – ‘oh, it’s just so-and-so moaning again about their pain’. They’ve learnt to keep quiet about it.

One of my participants described the fact that she didn’t like to think of herself as Mrs Never-Well. This meant that she was always guarding what she was saying. She didn’t explain to her husband or to her children how she was feeling; she tried to hide it from people. When she went to her doctor, it was ‘how are you, Mrs So-and-so?’ – ‘I’m fine, thank you, doctor.’ That’s her first response, even though she’s got a problem. Within the groups, there became a kind of joking about this: ‘I’m fine, but…’ This way, they had to develop a means of communicating with other people in order to get their message across about their pain. It was a defence mechanism, really, but it was also a way of controlling the communication that they had. It was a way of them placing themselves in charge of the communication with others so that they could dictate… they were subverting their relationship, their communication with their GP.

Evans: That’s a really interesting point again, because I found one of the worst questions that I could be asked is ‘how are you doing?’ And normally, I’d say ‘fine’ – if you’re asked ‘how are you feeling’, the last thing you want to say is ‘I feel total rubbish. I’m glad you asked. Let’s go through it together.’ Nobody wants that.

Parsons: No. And I actually use this as a scenario with my students. I give them the example of they’ve somebody in a supermarket they haven’t seen for a long, long time. And they ask them how they are, and their friend talks about their bad back, and half an hour later, they’re still telling them about their bad back and the ice cream’s melted and the children are playing up and the husband’s walked off and gone and sat in the car, tooting the horn, waiting for them to come out… Anyway, they finally manage to get away from their friend. The next week, they see their friend in the supermarket and they have a choice, because their friend hasn’t seen them: do they go up and say hello again or do they dodge down the aisle and hope that their friend hasn’t seen them? You can imagine what the response is from the students and it’s a normal human response, because when we ask people how they are, we’re not interested in how they are, we want to tell them how we feel. It’s just a part of the social glue. It’s another way of saying hello.

Evans: What major outcomes have come from your research, do you think?

Parsons: There were two full learning communities that were sustainable over time and we were able to work through a 10-week process together. Both groups had a problem with communicating with healthcare professionals and others. And how they dealt with that; how they realised that and they had to take some kind of ownership of that communication. They talked about the hard life of having chronic pain; they talked about going through cycles of having to repeat treatments when they saw new doctors, that they knew wouldn’t work, but they had to do it because if they didn’t do it, they would be viewed as being non-compliant, which, as one lady put it, was the death knell – as soon as you’re labelled as non-compliant, that’s it, you’re out.

One of the other things that they came across was accepting the need to make adjustments. They were kind of fighting the need to make adaptations in their lives – they were trying to carry on as they were before their pain. When they had good days, they were overdoing it and then suffering as a result, which we all know, I think it’s been called ‘activity cycling’ or various other [Evans: Boom and bust] …boom and bust kind of approach to things.

An example would be, because these were all ladies in this group, they were talking about doing housework – how their husbands didn’t notice that the house hadn’t been dusted for a week, so why did they have to do it every single day? Why were they so hard on themselves? So they talked about ways that they could maybe make allowances for themselves, forgive themselves for not doing so much.

And then other learning community, they looked at ways that they could learn to adapt to their pain – not the same as making adjustments – it was about coming to some kind of accommodation with their pain, some kind of understanding as to how they could fit pain into their lives. Whereas, they’d been fighting it before and maybe they had to sort of realise that it wasn’t going to go away and they had to adapt to having pain. And the participants worked at individual ways of doing that, but in a shared, collaborative way.

So that is a new thing, that people can come together and teach each other about that without having an expert come in and tell them how to do it. Doing it in an informal way, in a way that seems disorganised, because when we sat down at the
beginning of an evening, we didn’t know where we were going to end up two hours later. From the point of view of an outcome, if I think about my research question, which was ‘can you set up learning communities with people who have chronic pain?’, then yes, you can.

I had this wonderful idea that I would be able to recruit about 10 people and have them come every evening for 10 weeks and keep them there all together. I soon learnt, quite early on, that that wasn’t feasible: I had a high drop-out. One group, I ended up with about six people; another group, I ended up with five. But what was interesting was instead of the drop-outs killing the communication, they actually contributed towards it. So people who left actually made the people who stayed think ‘why am I staying? Why am I interested in this?’ They made comparisons to the people who left – ‘what is it [that’s] different about me to them?’ So it helped them explore themselves and develop their own self-awareness: ‘am I open to this [while] they’re not?’

Evans: Going back to the point you were making about participatory-action research, that when you came into it, you [were] the theoretical expert [Parsons: mmm] whereas the patients were actually the expert [Parsons: yes], was it right that you should be doing the research, or perhaps should the patients have been doing the research?
Parsons: Ideally, participatory-action research should be something which is thought of by the participants, designed by the participants; [something that] participants take part in. They also take part in any analysis of the findings and in the actual production of a discussion and conclusion and further research.

Evans: So guide me through this: if a self-help group [Parsons: yep] wanted to set up research like this [Parsons: yes], how would they go about it?

Parsons: They could either do it all themselves just for the fun of it, I guess, or just to generate their own knowledge; or they could approach an academic and say, ‘we have a problem [and] we’d like you to help us explore it’; or they could become the academics themselves. That would be the ideal.

Evans: But what would the benefit be to the participants?

Parsons: The whole point of participation research is it’s not about benefits for anybody else; it’s about benefits for the participants. They would learn more about themselves. They would learn more about their lives, perhaps gain in confidence, gain in self-esteem, produce something meaningful to themselves, be able to explain things to other people…

Evans: So it’s removing the oppressor.

Parsons: Yeah, because it’s all about raising awareness; raising consciousness; empowering yourself. And when you’re empowered, you’re less likely to be oppressed.

Evans: That’s Gareth Parsons, senior lecturer at the University of South Wales. Don’t forget that you can still download all editions of Airing Pain from painconcern.org.uk or you can obtain CD copies direct from Pain Concern. If you’d like to put a question to our panel of experts or just make a comment about these programmes, then please do so via our blog, message board, email, Facebook, Twitter. All the contact details are on our website, and once again, it’s painconcern.org.uk. On the website, you’ll also find details of Airing Pain’s companion magazine Pain Matters, which is available as an online subscription or direct by post.

Okay, to end this edition of Airing Pain, I’ll leave you with maybe a controversial thought to take away and discuss at your own learning community: does what Anna Semlyen now say just apply to yoga?

Semlyen: Low-tech healthcare has to be the future, really. We’ve got to go towards things that are both effective and cheap and yoga fits those two categories very, very well. It allows people to be their own healers and isn’t that a fantastic thing that you can choose to be?


Contributors:

  • Anna Semlyen, yoga teacher, British Wheel of Yoga
  • Gareth Parsons, Lecturer, University of South Wales.

More information:

  • You can find out more about using yoga to help with lower back pain and buy the yoga programme book and accompanying CD from the project’s website: Yogaforbacks.co.uk.

     

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Airing Pain, the popular digital radio programme for people living with chronic pain, will return to the airwaves for a fourth series on Tuesday 22 April at 8pm.

Tens of thousands of listeners tuned into the last series and Pain Concern hope that many more will discover Airing Pain this time around.

The first programme will take a look at two very different ways of giving people in pain the knowledge and power to help themselves – yoga and asking “how are you?”

Christine Johnson speaks to yoga teacher Anna Semlyen about a study that shows yoga can be an effective and cost-effective treatment for chronic low back pain. Semlyen, who helped design the programme used by the research trial, recalls how she has seen people get back into gardening or extreme sports after taking up yoga.

Meanwhile, the real experts on pain are not the clinicians or researchers, but the people who live with it every day, according to academic Gareth Parsons. His research looked at how social rituals as simple as asking “how are you” can be difficult for some people living with pain and how people can find ways to help themselves.

Other subjects to be included in the nine programmes include spinal cord stimulators, young carers, and interviews with people who manage their own everyday pain and internationally-recognised experts.

Airing Pain is produced and presented by Sony Award-winning BBC broadcaster Paul Evans, who says he has discovered knowledge with a ‘life-changing’ impact for his own chronic pain while working on the show. Paul’s experiences are shared by many others, with 80% of listeners surveyed saying they find the radio programmes helpful and 90% saying they would recommend them to others.

New programmes will be broadcast weekly, starting on Tuesday at 8pm on the digital station Able Radio. It is then be available to listen or download on painconcern.org.uk alongside all 54 previous editions.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

Pain Concern is developing a database on interested volunteers who feel they could share their experiences of living with pain with the Media.

The Media don’t want a medical definition of chronic pain. We can give them the information. Their enquiries are more than this. They want to speak with someone who endures it on a daily basis and the impact it has.

Sharing your stories with others is integral to our key message of promoting greater understanding.
Anyone interested please contact the Pain Concern office on 0131 669 5951 or email: editorial@painconcern.org.uk.

Please visit our Volunteer page to find more about volunteering for us.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

This survey is now closed

Pain Concern would like to invite you to an online survey of our Pain Matters magazine. You can take the survey by following the Pain Matters Survey link.

Since 1995 Pain Matters has been a valuable resource for many people living with pain and healthcare professionals. In 58 editions of the magazine we have brought news, features and comments on pain management, research into treatments and personal experiences of living with pain to our readers. The publication has evolved from its early days as a support group newsletter to a full-colour magazine reaching readers across the UK.

We are constantly trying to improve Pain Matters and would welcome your thoughts on the magazine. The survey should take between 5 and 10 minutes and at the end respondents will have a chance to be entered into a prize draw for a £20 Marks & Spencer voucher.

Please go to the Pain Matters Magazine webpage to read more about the magazine and find out how to purchase or subscribe.

Peer Support. Join the community

“Having chronic pain is very lonely.”

Join the community

Subscribe to Pain Matters

Everything you need to know about how to live with chronic pain

Subscribe

 

 

In pain? Don’t understand what’s happening?

“Having someone to help you prepare for your life through pain”

Our Pain Education Sessions

Fundraise for Pain Concern

Help us to help others

Fundraise

 

1 35 36 37 38 39 49